ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM vs Razer Blade 14 (2025)
47.1Performance51.1
41.5Display34
60Battery62.7
69.8Portability69.7
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM3 spec wins — Razer Blade 14 (2025)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM scores 52.6 against 52.7 for Razer Blade 14 (2025). Pick by the categories that matter to you — Razer Blade 14 (2025) edges ahead in performance and battery, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM
- Stronger display score: 42 vs 34
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 10% lower weight: 1.46 kg vs 1.63 kg
- Lower launch price: $1,700 vs $2,299
Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 14 (2025)
- Stronger performance score: 51 vs 47
- 19% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 15,137 vs 12,693
- 19% lower thickness: 16.2 mm vs 19.9 mm
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 14 ″ | 14 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare (100% sRGB, G-Sync) | OLED |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 2880x1800 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits+9% | 367 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X-7500 (soldered) | LPDDR5X-8000 (soldered) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD (2 slots) | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (1 slot) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,878Top 35% | 2,888Top 31% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 12,693Bottom 45% | 15,137+19%Top 32% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 73 Wh+1% | 72 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | 11.2 h | — |
| Charging | 200 W | 200 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.46 kg+10% | 1.63 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 16.2 mm+19% |
| Material | Aluminum lid and bottom case (MIL-STD-810H tested) | CNC aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x USB4 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery, 40Gbps), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, 10Gbps), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, microSD reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB4, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, microSD (UHS-II), 3.5mm |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD with IR | 1080p + IR |
| Biometrics | IR camera for Windows Hello face login | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KM | Razer Blade 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs ASUS ExpertBook P3 G2 (PM3406CHA)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWVSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401KMvs ASUS Zenbook DUO (2025) UX8406CAVSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)VSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs ASUS ExpertBook P3 G2 (PM3406CHA)VSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815VSRazer Blade 14 (2025)vs MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XWVS