Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Panasonic Let's note SC7

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
58.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Panasonic Let's note SC7
58.6Inno Score
51.3chipPerformancechip55.4
55Display—
86.7Battery41.3
42.5Portability86.1
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)3 spec wins — Panasonic Let's note SC7

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 58.4 against 58.6 for Panasonic Let's note SC7. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Panasonic Let's note SC7 edges ahead in portability and performance, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 41
  • 331% higher charging: 280 W vs 65 W
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 61% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 56 Wh
  • 29% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 12.4 ″

Reasons to pick the Panasonic Let's note SC7

  • Stronger performance score: 55 vs 51
  • Stronger portability score: 86 vs 43
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 60% lower weight: 0.92 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 10% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 22.1 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Panasonic Let's note SC7
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Panasonic Let's note SC7
Screen size16 ″+29%12.4 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-SyncFHD+ TFT LCD, 3:2, anti-glare, non-touch
Resolution2560x16001920x1280
Refresh rate165 Hz—

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Panasonic Let's note SC7
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Panasonic Let's note SC7
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 7940HXIntel Core Ultra 7 366H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)Intel integrated graphics
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)LPDDR5X (soldered)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)PCIe NVMe SSD

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Panasonic Let's note SC7
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Panasonic Let's note SC7
Capacity90 Wh+61%56 Wh
Charging280 W+331%65 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Panasonic Let's note SC7
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Panasonic Let's note SC7
Weight2.27 kg0.92 kg+60%
Thickness22.1 mm19.9 mm+10%

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Panasonic Let's note SC7
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Panasonic Let's note SC7
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB-C (Thunderbolt 4 / USB4, Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 5Gbps, RJ-45 LAN (1000BASE-T), HDMI (4K 144Hz), 3.5mm headset jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HDFHD 1080p (2.07MP) camera with privacy shutter
Biometrics—Face recognition (Windows Hello); fingerprint reader optional

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus Panasonic Let's note SC7
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Panasonic Let's note SC7
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Related comparisons

Try another matchup