ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 vs HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)
44.3Performance36
36.5Display25.7
74.1Battery57.3
26.4Portability78.1
7 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA8082 spec wins — HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 scores 45.7 against 45.7 for HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 edges ahead in battery and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808
- Stronger performance score: 44 vs 36
- Stronger display score: 37 vs 26
- Stronger battery score: 74 vs 57
- 269% higher charging: 240 W vs 65 W
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
Reasons to pick the HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)
- Stronger portability score: 78 vs 26
- 46% lower weight: 1.41 kg vs 2.6 kg
- 44% lower thickness: 14.9 mm vs 26.7 mm
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 18 ″+29% | 14 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB) | IPS (anti-glare) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 337 nits+12% | 300 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 260 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225U |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W) | Intel Graphics (integrated) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB) | LPDDR5-5200 (onboard) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB+100% | 512 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots) | PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,663+15%Bottom 37% | 2,324Bottom 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 12,291+20%Bottom 36% | 10,247Bottom 12% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+32% | 68 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | 13.2 h | — |
| Charging | 240 W+269% | 65 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 1.41 kg+46% |
| Thickness | 26.7 mm | 14.9 mm+44% |
| Material | Plastic | Aluminum with a sandblasted anodized finish and recycled aluminum content |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort with G-Sync, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 Gigabit LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 1x Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (40Gbps, USB Power Delivery 3.1, DisplayPort 2.1), 1x USB-C (10Gbps, USB Power Delivery 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4a), 1x USB-A (10Gbps), 1x USB-A (5Gbps), HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | FHD (1080p) with IR | 5MP IR camera with temporal noise reduction and privacy shutter |
| Biometrics | IR camera for Windows Hello face login | IR camera |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808 | HP OmniBook 7 14 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808vs Samsung Galaxy Book6VSASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808vs Dell 16 Plus (DB16250)VSASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A18 (2025) FA808vs IdeaPad Slim 5 14ARP10VSHP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)vs Samsung Galaxy Book6VSHP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)vs Dell 16 Plus (DB16250)VSHP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 14 (2024)VSHP OmniBook 7 14 (2025)vs IdeaPad Slim 5 14ARP10VS