ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) vs HP Victus 15 (2025)
34.8Performancespec-based34.6
32.4chipGraphics80.2
23.3Displayspec-based35.3
62.3Batteryspec-based32.6
57.2Portabilityspec-based40
5 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)4 spec wins — HP Victus 15 (2025)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) scores 40.7 against 41.1 for HP Victus 15 (2025). Pick by the categories that matter to you — HP Victus 15 (2025) edges ahead in graphics, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)
- 228% higher Web browsing endurance: 14.1 h vs 4.3 h
- 25% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,588 vs 8,444
- 18% lower weight: 1.88 kg vs 2.29 kg
- 15% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 23.5 mm
Reasons to pick the HP Victus 15 (2025)
- Stronger graphics score: 80 vs 32
- 140% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 50% higher RAM: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- 40% higher capacity: 70 Wh vs 50 Wh
Display
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+3% | 15.6 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (45% NTSC) | IPS |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1080 |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz+140% |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | Intel Core i5-13420H |
| Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno (integrated) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 80W) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X (soldered) | DDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD | PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,145Bottom 4% | 2,231+4%Bottom 5% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,588+25%Bottom 13% | 8,444Bottom 5% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU) | — | 9,505Bottom 16% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 50 Wh | 70 Wh+40% |
| Web browsing endurance | 14.1 h+228% | 4.3 h |
| Charging | 65 W | — |
Design
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.88 kg+18% | 2.29 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm+15% | 23.5 mm |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB4 Gen 3 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort and power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 TMDS, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 1x USB-C (5Gbps, USB Power Delivery 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4a), 2x USB-A (5Gbps), HDMI 2.1, RJ-45, 3.5mm headphone/microphone combo jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (Wi-Fi 6E on Intel AX211 versions) |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 (Intel AX211 versions) |
| Webcam | FHD with IR and privacy shutter | 720p HD camera with temporal noise reduction |
| Biometrics | IR camera for Windows Hello face login | None |
Software
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | HP Victus 15 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs HP ProBook 4 G1i 16VSASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 (Intel)VSASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs HP EliteBook 6 G1i 16VSASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11VSHP Victus 15 (2025)vs Samsung Galaxy Book4VSHP Victus 15 (2025)vs ASUS Vivobook S14 (S5452MA)VSHP Victus 15 (2025)vs Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IWC11VSHP Victus 15 (2025)vs Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14IWC11VS