ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) vs Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11
34.8Performancechip39.7
23.3Display38.3
62.3Battery46.7
57.2Portability46.1
3 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)4 spec wins — Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) scores 42 against 42 for Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) edges ahead in battery and portability, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 47
- Stronger portability score: 57 vs 46
- 14% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 23.3 mm
- 10% lower weight: 1.88 kg vs 2.1 kg
- Lower launch price: $750 vs $1,645
Reasons to pick the Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11
- Stronger performance score: 40 vs 35
- Stronger display score: 38 vs 23
- 277% higher charging: 245 W vs 65 W
- 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
Display
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+5% | 15.3 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (45% NTSC) | IPS (anti-glare, 100% sRGB, FreeSync, G-Sync) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz+175% |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | AMD Ryzen 7 250 |
| Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno (integrated) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (8GB GDDR7, 115W) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X (soldered) | DDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 1,024 GB+100% |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,145Bottom 3% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,588Bottom 13% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 50 Wh | 60 Wh+20% |
| Web browsing endurance | 14.1 h | — |
| Charging | 65 W | 245 W+277% |
Design
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.88 kg+10% | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm+14% | 23.3 mm |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic (PC-ABS) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB4 Gen 3 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort and power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 TMDS, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB-A 5Gbps, USB-A 10Gbps, USB-C USB4 40Gbps (DisplayPort 1.4, 65-100W PD), HDMI 2.1, RJ-45 Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | FHD with IR and privacy shutter | 5MP with e-shutter |
| Biometrics | IR camera for Windows Hello face login | None |
Software
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs MSI Modern A14 AI+ F3HMVSASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs MSI Cyborg 17 B13WVSASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs Samsung Galaxy Book5 (15.6-inch)VSASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)vs Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14IWC11VSLenovo LOQ 15AHP11vs MSI Modern A14 AI+ F3HMVSLenovo LOQ 15AHP11vs MSI Cyborg 17 B13WVSLenovo LOQ 15AHP11vs Samsung Galaxy Book5 (15.6-inch)VSLenovo LOQ 15AHP11vs Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 14IWC11VS