Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) vs MSI Cyborg 17 B13W

WINNER
ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)
42Inno Score
VS
MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
41.8Inno Score
34.8Performancechip41.5
23.3Display48
62.3Battery40.3
57.2Portability35.5
2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)5 spec wins — MSI Cyborg 17 B13W

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) scores 42 against 41.8 for MSI Cyborg 17 B13W. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) edges ahead in battery and portability, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)

  • Stronger battery score: 62 vs 40
  • Stronger portability score: 57 vs 36
  • 25% lower weight: 1.88 kg vs 2.5 kg
  • 10% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 22.2 mm

Reasons to pick the MSI Cyborg 17 B13W

  • Stronger performance score: 42 vs 35
  • Stronger display score: 48 vs 23
  • 140% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 131% higher charging: 150 W vs 65 W
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
Screen size16 ″17.3 ″+8%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (45% NTSC)IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1080
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz+140%
Peak brightness300 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100Intel Core i7-13620H
GraphicsQualcomm Adreno (integrated)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 60W)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X (soldered)DDR5-5200
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typeM.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDPCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
Geekbench 6 (single)2,145Bottom 3%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,588Bottom 13%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
Capacity50 Wh55 Wh+10%
Web browsing endurance14.1 h—
Charging65 W150 W+131%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
Weight1.88 kg+25%2.5 kg
Thickness19.9 mm+10%22.2 mm
MaterialPlastic—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
Ports2x USB4 Gen 3 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort and power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 TMDS, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB-C (USB 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, Power Delivery 3.0), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35.3
WebcamFHD with IR and privacy shutter720p HD
BiometricsIR camera for Windows Hello face login—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) versus MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
SpecASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA)MSI Cyborg 17 B13W
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup