Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) vs Razer Blade 16 (2025)

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)
45.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Razer Blade 16 (2025)
54.1Inno Score
44Performance51.2
35.3Display52.2
36.7Battery61.9
72.7Portability52.5
2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)6 spec wins — Razer Blade 16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

Razer Blade 16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 54.1 to 45.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+25) and display (+17). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)

  • Stronger portability score: 73 vs 53
  • 30% lower weight: 1.5 kg vs 2.14 kg

Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 52 vs 35
  • Stronger battery score: 62 vs 37
  • 483% higher charging: 280 W vs 48 W
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, non-touch (100% sRGB)OLED
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate144 Hz240 Hz+67%
Peak brightness300 nits400 nits+33%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core 7 Processor 350 (6-core, up to 4.8GHz, 17 TOPS NPU)AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
GraphicsIntel Graphics (integrated)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeLPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable)LPDDR5X-8000
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typeM.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDPCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,780Bottom 46%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,400Bottom 46%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Capacity53 Wh90 Wh+71%
Web browsing endurance—10 h
Charging48 W280 W+483%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Weight1.5 kg+30%2.14 kg
Thickness16.9 mm+4%17.6 mm
MaterialAll-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testingCNC aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB4, 3x USB-A, HDMI 2.1, SD (UHS-II), 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera with Windows Hello support1080p + IR
BiometricsWindows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader)IR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA) versus Razer Blade 16 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)Razer Blade 16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup