Skip to content
InnoReviews

Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 vs MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W

Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
65.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
65.7Inno Score
61.4chipPerformancespec-based56.5
61chipGraphics87.6
58Displayspec-based80
78.7Batteryspec-based86.7
72Portabilityspec-based20
1 spec wins — Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 20253 spec wins — MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 scores 65.6 against 65.7 for MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W. Pick by the categories that matter to you — MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W edges ahead in graphics, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025

  • 46% lower thickness: 16 mm vs 29.7 mm

Reasons to pick the MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W

  • Stronger graphics score: 88 vs 61
  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz

Display

Display comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Resolution2880x18002560x1600
Refresh rate120 Hz240 Hz+100%
Peak brightness1,100 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 285HAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
GraphicsIntel Arc 140T (integrated)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X-8533DDR5-5200
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeNVMe SSD (PCIe 4.0, 2x M.2 slots)NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,835Top 48%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—16,362Top 30%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)—13,644Top 31%

Battery

Battery comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
Capacity84 Wh90 Wh+7%
Charging—240 W

Design

Design comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
Weight—2.8 kg
Thickness16 mm+46%29.7 mm
Material—Metal lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
Ports2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI 2.1, SD card reader, 3.5mm headset jack3x USB-A 3.2 Gen2, 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (DisplayPort, Power Delivery 3.0), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth—5.3
Webcam1080p IR camera with ToF sensor and privacy shutter720p HD with shutter
BiometricsFace recognition—

Software

Software comparison: Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025 versus MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
SpecLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025MSI Crosshair A17 HX D8W
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup