Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) vs Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025

WINNER
ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)
65.7Inno Score
VS
Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
65.6Inno Score
65.8Performancespec-basedchip61.4
82.9chipGraphicschip61
46.9Displayspec-based58
60Batteryspec-based78.7
84.4Portabilityspec-based72
2 spec wins — ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)3 spec wins — Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) scores 65.7 against 65.6 for Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) edges ahead in graphics, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)

  • Stronger graphics score: 83 vs 61
  • 50% higher Refresh rate: 180 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025

  • 120% higher Peak brightness: 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
  • 20% higher capacity: 84 Wh vs 70 Wh
  • 19% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 13.4 ″

Display

Display comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
Screen size13.4 ″16 ″+19%
Panel typeIPS-level touchscreen (ROG Nebula, Gorilla Glass 5 with DXC coating)OLED
Resolution2560x16002880x1800
Refresh rate180 Hz+50%120 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits1,100 nits+120%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
GraphicsAMD Radeon 8060SIntel Arc 140T (integrated)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X-8000 (soldered)LPDDR5X-8533
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeM.2 2230 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDNVMe SSD (PCIe 4.0, 2x M.2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
Geekbench 6 (single)2,978Top 24%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)21,269Top 5%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
Capacity70 Wh84 Wh+20%
Charging200 W—

Design

Design comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
Weight1.2 kg—
Thickness14.9 mm+7%16 mm
MaterialCNC-milled aluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
Ports2x USB4 Type-C (DisplayPort, Power Delivery), 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD (UHS-II), 3.5mm audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI 2.1, SD card reader, 3.5mm headset jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.4—
Webcam5MP IR front camera, 13MP rear camera1080p IR camera with ToF sensor and privacy shutter
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)Face recognition

Software

Software comparison: ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025) versus Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
SpecASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 GT 2025
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup