Skip to content
InnoReviews

HONOR 400 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A35

HONOR 400 Lite
48.5Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A35
48.5Inno Score
34.6Performance42.7
67.6Display45.3
35.6Camera41.9
50.9Battery55.7
73.3Features70.7
13 spec wins — HONOR 400 Lite3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: HONOR 400 Lite scores 48.5 against 48.5 for Samsung Galaxy A35. Pick by the categories that matter to you — HONOR 400 Lite edges ahead in display and features, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the HONOR 400 Lite

  • Stronger display score: 68 vs 45
  • 250% higher Peak brightness: 3,500 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
  • 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • Stronger performance score: 43 vs 35
  • Stronger camera score: 42 vs 36
  • Stronger battery score: 56 vs 51
  • 60% higher ultra-wide: 8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Has OIS — the other doesn't

Display

Display comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.7 ″+2%6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1080x24121080x2340
Pixel density394 ppi+1%390 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,500 nits+250%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body93.7 %+10%84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 UltraSamsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTu—739,266Bottom 8%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—291,093Bottom 13%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—86,789Bottom 8%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—132,410Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—228,974Bottom 11%
Geekbench 6 (single)956Bottom 29%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,256Bottom 25%—
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB128/256GB

Camera

Camera comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.75f/1.8
Ultra-wide5 MP8 MP+60%
Optical zoom—1 x
Max video1080p@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera16 MP+23%13 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity5,230 mAh+5%5,000 mAh
Wired charging35 W+40%25 W
Wireless charging—0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight171 g+18%209 g
Thickness7.3 mm+11%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP65IP67
Frame materialPlasticPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 15 (MagicOS 9.0)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge6 years+50%4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: HONOR 400 Lite versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecHONOR 400 LiteSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup