Skip to content
InnoReviews

iPhone SE (3rd gen) vs ZTE Blade A75 5G

iPhone SE (3rd gen)
41Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ZTE Blade A75 5G
41.1Inno Score
53Performancechip31.3
21.3Display50.5
31.9Camera29
27.7Battery49.1
89.3Features60
3 spec wins — iPhone SE (3rd gen)6 spec wins — ZTE Blade A75 5G

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: iPhone SE (3rd gen) scores 41 against 41.1 for ZTE Blade A75 5G. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ZTE Blade A75 5G edges ahead in display and battery, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the iPhone SE (3rd gen)

  • Stronger performance score: 53 vs 31
  • Stronger features score: 89 vs 60
  • 30% lower weight: 144 g vs 206 g
  • 23% higher Pixel density: 326 ppi vs 266 ppi
  • 15% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.6 mm

Reasons to pick the ZTE Blade A75 5G

  • Stronger display score: 51 vs 21
  • Stronger battery score: 49 vs 28
  • 317% higher Main camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
  • 148% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 2,018 mAh
  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 60 Hz

Display

Display comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
Screen size4.7 ″6.6 ″+40%
Panel typeRetina IPS LCDIPS LCD
Resolution750x1334720x1612
Pixel density326 ppi+23%266 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz+100%
Peak brightness625 nits—
Screen-to-body65.4 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
ChipsetApple A15 BionicUnisoc T760
AnTuTu1,283,597Bottom 35%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)363,916Bottom 27%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)339,510Bottom 34%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)166,374Bottom 24%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)413,797Bottom 40%—
RAM (max)4 GB4 GB
Storage options64/128/256GB128GB
Storage typeNVMeUFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
Main camera12 MP50 MP+317%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Optical zoom1 x—
Max video4K@60fps4K@30fps
Front camera7 MP8 MP+14%
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
Capacity2,018 mAh5,000 mAh+148%
Wired charging20 W—
Wireless charging7.5 W—
Active use endurance7 h—

Design

Design comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
Weight144 g+30%206 g
Thickness7.3 mm+15%8.6 mm
IP ratingIP67—
Frame materialAluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.2
NFCYesYes
USBLightningUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYes—

Software

Software comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
OS at launchiOS 15Android 13
OS update pledge6 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: iPhone SE (3rd gen) versus ZTE Blade A75 5G
SpeciPhone SE (3rd gen)ZTE Blade A75 5G
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup