Skip to content
InnoReviews

iQOO 16 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

iQOO 16
87Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
87.8Inno Score
92.9chipPerformance92.4
96.8Display82.3
65.5Camera84.6
90.2Battery91.5
86.7Features84
6 spec wins — iQOO 167 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: iQOO 16 scores 87 against 87.8 for Vivo X300 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Vivo X300 Ultra edges ahead in camera and battery, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the iQOO 16

  • Stronger display score: 97 vs 82
  • 122% higher Peak brightness: 10,000 nits vs 4,500 nits
  • 27% higher capacity: 8,400 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 66
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 23% higher Optical zoom: 3.7 x vs 3 x

Display

Display comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.85 ″6.82 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution3168x14401440x3168
Pixel density508 ppi510 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness10,000 nits+122%4,500 nits
Screen-to-body94.4 %+5%90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,770,706Top 5%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,029,149Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,375,957Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—516,143Top 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—849,457Top 4%
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 2%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256GB/512GB/1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.9
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
Capacity8,400 mAh+27%6,600 mAh
Wired charging100 W100 W
Wireless charging40 W40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
Weight223 g+4%232 g
Thickness8.3 mm8.2 mm+1%
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2 Gen 1USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 17 (OriginOS 7)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: iQOO 16 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpeciQOO 16Vivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup