itel City 200 vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
20chipPerformancechip20
38.3Display35.9
29Camera30.1
40.7Battery42.1
20Features20
6 spec wins — itel City 2002 spec wins — ZTE Blade A76 4G
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: itel City 200 scores 29.6 against 29.6 for ZTE Blade A76 4G. Pick by the categories that matter to you — itel City 200 edges ahead in display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the itel City 200
- 50% higher RAM (max): 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 40% higher Peak brightness: 700 nits vs 500 nits
- 33% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 90 Hz
- 13% lower thickness: 7.5 mm vs 8.6 mm
Reasons to pick the ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 25% higher Wired charging: 23 W vs 18 W
Display
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 6.75 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 720x1576 | 720x1612 |
| Pixel density | 256 ppi | 262 ppi+2% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits+40% | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Unisoc T7250 |
| RAM (max) | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 64/128GB |
Camera
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Max video | — | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — |
Battery
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,200 mAh+4% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 23 W+25% |
Design
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Thickness | 7.5 mm+13% | 8.6 mm |
| IP rating | IP65 | IP54 |
Connectivity
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | No |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C 2.0 |
Software
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
Audio
| Spec | itel City 200 | ZTE Blade A76 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |