itel P55T vs OUKITEL C58 Pro
20chipPerformancechip20
29.1Display31
29Camera29
48.2Battery40.2
20Features33.3
4 spec wins — itel P55T2 spec wins — OUKITEL C58 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: itel P55T scores 29.3 against 29.4 for OUKITEL C58 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — OUKITEL C58 Pro edges ahead in features and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the itel P55T
- Stronger battery score: 48 vs 40
- 80% higher Wired charging: 18 W vs 10 W
- 17% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 5,150 mAh
- 16% higher Peak brightness: 500 nits vs 430 nits
Reasons to pick the OUKITEL C58 Pro
- Stronger features score: 33 vs 20
- 50% higher RAM (max): 6 GB vs 4 GB
Display
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 ″ | 6.7 ″+2% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1600 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi+2% | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits+16% | 430 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 83.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Unisoc T606 |
| RAM (max) | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 128GB | 256GB |
Camera
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Max video | — | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
Battery
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+17% | 5,150 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W+80% | 10 W |
Design
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 199 g |
| Thickness | — | 8.7 mm |
Connectivity
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
Software
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (Go Edition) | Android 14 |
Audio
| Spec | itel P55T | OUKITEL C58 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |

