Motorola Razr (2026) vs Vivo X200 Pro
23.1Performance74.5
60.2Display73.2
54.8Camera72
47.2Battery79.9
100Features78.7
3 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)8 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and battery (+33). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 79
- 16% lower weight: 188 g vs 223 g
- 15% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.5 mm
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 47
- 200% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 30 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 452 ppi+9% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 2,800+153%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 8,600+157%Top 16% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 90 W+200% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+16% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+15% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS