Motorola Razr (2026) vs Vivo X300 Pro
23.1Performance86.9
60.2Display74.3
54.8Camera75.8
47.2Battery83.3
100Features84
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)9 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and battery (+36). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
- 69% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 100 % vs 59 %
- 17% lower weight: 188 g vs 226 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 47
- 213% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,473 vs 1,108
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 452 ppi+9% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,533,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 3,473+213%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 10,264+207%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %+69%Top 3% | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,510 mAh+36% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 90 W+200% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+17% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+9% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | — | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS

