Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
38.9Performance74.5
73.9Display73.2
54.7Camera72
57.2Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra12 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+36) and battery (+23). Motorola Razr 50 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 17% lower thickness: 7.1 mm vs 8.5 mm
- 15% lower weight: 189 g vs 223 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 39
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 57
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 452 ppi+9% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | 2,800+52%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | 8,600+86%Top 16% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3.7 x+85% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+50% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | 13 h+7% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+15% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+17% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS