Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
67.3Performance74.5
81.6Display73.2
58.6Camera72
75.5Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra5 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 70.7, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+13) and performance (+7). Motorola Razr 60 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 73
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 17% higher Active use endurance: 15.2 h vs 13 h
- 15% lower thickness: 7.2 mm vs 8.5 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 76
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+3% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | 90.3 %+5% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+7%Top 14% | 2,800Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784Top 19% | 8,600+10%Top 16% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 6,000 mAh+28% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h+17% | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+11% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+15% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS

