Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
67.3Performance64.4
77.2Display43.7
65.5Camera55.7
79.3Battery60.8
94.7Features60
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr Fold2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Fold wins this phone face-off, 74 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+34). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Fold
- Stronger display score: 77 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 79 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,900 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 23% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 8.1 ″
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8.1 ″ | 10 ″+23% |
| Panel type | LTPO pOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2484x2232 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 412 ppi+53% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,200 nits+288% | 1,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,609Top 20% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,915Top 15% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 82 %Bottom 49% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+7% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 243 g+21% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 4.6 mm+64% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP49 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Foldvs Huawei Pura 90 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Foldvs OPPO Find X9sVSMotorola Razr Foldvs RedMagic 10 ProVSMotorola Razr Foldvs Xiaomi 15T ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS