Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Vivo X200 Pro
40.5Performance74.5
74Display73.2
54.8Camera72
50.4Battery79.9
100Features78.7
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)8 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 58, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+34) and battery (+30). Motorola Razr+ (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 79
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 17% lower thickness: 7.1 mm vs 8.5 mm
- 15% lower weight: 189 g vs 223 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 41
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 50
- 100% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 45 W
- 100% higher Wireless charging: 30 W vs 15 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 452 ppi+9% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 2,800+46%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 8,600+78%Top 16% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh+33% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+15% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+17% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS