Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Vivo X300 Pro
40.5Performance86.9
74Display74.3
54.8Camera75.8
50.4Battery83.3
100Features84
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)10 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 58, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and battery (+33). Motorola Razr+ (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 16% lower weight: 189 g vs 226 g
- 11% lower thickness: 7.1 mm vs 8 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 41
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 50
- 167% higher Wireless charging: 40 W vs 15 W
- 112% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,264 vs 4,833
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 452 ppi+9% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,533,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 3,473+81%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 10,264+112%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | 59 %+12%Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,510 mAh+45% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+16% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+11% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | — | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS