Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs POCO F3

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
POCO F3

Xiaomi

POCO F3

$349

41.4Inno Score
77Performance34.7
85.3Display47.5
58.6Camera31.3
77.3Battery43.3
73.3Features65.3
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — POCO F3

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 41.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and display (+38). POCO F3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 35
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 48
  • Stronger camera score: 59 vs 31
  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 43
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 65

Reasons to pick the POCO F3

  • Lower launch price: $349 vs $1,500

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
Screen size7 ″+5%6.67 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29922400x1080
Pixel density462 ppi+17%395 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+285%1,300 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteSnapdragon 870
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared2,841,165990,057Bottom 39%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—378,834Bottom 39%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—171,089Bottom 39%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—173,146Bottom 38%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—266,988Bottom 33%
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956+182%Top 15%1,050Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651+188%Top 16%3,000Bottom 40%
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options512GB128GB / 256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
Main camera50 MP+4%48 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+150%20 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
Capacity5,000 mAh+11%4,520 mAh
Wired charging68 W+106%33 W
Wireless charging30 W—
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
Weight199 g196 g+2%
Thickness7.2 mm+8%7.8 mm
IP ratingIP48IP53
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 11 (MIUI 12)
OS update pledge3 years3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus POCO F3
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)POCO F3
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup