Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
77Performance64.4
85.3Display43.7
58.6Camera55.7
77.3Battery60.8
73.3Features60
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+42) and battery (+17). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,500 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 43% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 7 ″
- 12% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″ | 10 ″+43% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+72% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+213% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+36% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+44% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS