Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 50 Pro
77Performance28.9
85.3Display75.9
58.6Camera56.6
77.3Battery63.3
73.3Features49.3
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 52.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and features (+24). TECNO CAMON 50 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 76
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 63
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Pro
- 23% higher capacity: 6,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+8% | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651Top 16% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1080p |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh+23% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+51% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+2% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | HiOS 16 |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs OPPO K13 TurboVSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs Samsung Galaxy S23VSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs realme P2 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs Redmi Note 14SVS