Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Vivo X200 Pro
77Performance73.5
85.3Display73.2
58.6Camera72
77.3Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) scores 74.7 against 74.9 for Vivo X200 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Vivo X200 Pro edges ahead in camera and features, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 77 vs 74
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 73
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 27% higher Active use endurance: 16.5 h vs 13 h
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 59
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 20% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+2% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+11% | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.3 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,841,165 | 2,636,748Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 793,282Top 30% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 908,496Top 30% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 356,065Top 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 578,905Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+7%Top 15% | 2,751Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+6%Top 16% | 8,152Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 44 %Bottom 5% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+27% | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+11% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+15% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs HONOR 600 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs OPPO Find X8VSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Xiaomi 15S ProVSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs iQOO Z10 Turbo ProVSVivo X200 Provs HONOR 600 ProVS