Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs Vivo X200 Pro
77Performance74.5
85.3Display73.2
58.6Camera72
77.3Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)4 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) scores 74.7 against 75.2 for Vivo X200 Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Vivo X200 Pro edges ahead in camera and features, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Stronger display score: 85 vs 73
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 27% higher Active use endurance: 16.5 h vs 13 h
- 15% lower thickness: 7.2 mm vs 8.5 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 59
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 20% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,500
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 462 ppi+2% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits+11% | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 87.3 % | 90.3 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | 2,841,165+11% | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,956+6%Top 21% | 2,800Top 23% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,651+1%Top 20% | 8,600Top 21% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 16.5 h+27% | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+11% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+15% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (Hello UI) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs POCO F8 ProVSMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vs Redmi K90VSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSVivo X200 Provs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVS