Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) vs vivo X300 FE

WINNER
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
74.7Inno Score
VS
vivo X300 FE
73Inno Score
77Performance67.9
85.3Display76.7
58.6Camera60.5
77.3Battery84
73.3Features84
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)6 spec wins — vivo X300 FE

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) wins this phone face-off, 74.7 to 73, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+9) and display (+9). vivo X300 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 77 vs 68
  • Stronger display score: 85 vs 77
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Reasons to pick the vivo X300 FE

  • Stronger battery score: 84 vs 77
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
  • 67% higher OS update pledge: 5 years vs 3 years
  • 33% higher Wireless charging: 40 W vs 30 W
  • 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
Screen size7 ″+11%6.31 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1224x29921216x2640
Pixel density462 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits5,000 nits
Screen-to-body87.3 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu2,841,165—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,956+3%Top 15%2,857Top 18%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,651Top 16%9,276+7%Top 13%
Wild Life Extreme stability—77 %Bottom 45%
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
Capacity5,000 mAh6,500 mAh+30%
Wired charging68 W90 W+32%
Wireless charging30 W40 W+33%
Active use endurance16.5 h—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
Weight199 g191 g+4%
Thickness7.2 mm+10%8 mm
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Hello UI)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) versus vivo X300 FE
SpecMotorola Razr Ultra (2026)vivo X300 FE
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup