OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
84.6Performance64.4
72.2Display43.7
74.4Camera55.7
92.9Battery60.8
84Features60
10 spec wins — OPPO Find X9 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.7 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+32) and display (+29). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Find X9 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 72 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 93 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 60
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 47% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.78 ″
Display
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 10 ″+47% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi+67% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+125% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 95.5 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 3,563,384 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,320Top 8% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,697Top 10% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 200 MP+1900% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@120fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,500 mAh+34% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 22 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 224 g+28% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm+36% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 5 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Find X9 Provs Vivo X300VSOPPO Find X9 Provs OnePlus 15VSOPPO Find X9 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSOPPO Find X9 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS