Skip to content
InnoReviews

OPPO Reno16 F 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro

OPPO Reno16 F 5G
60.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X200 Pro

vivo

Vivo X200 Pro

$1,099

75.2Inno Score
46.7Performance74.5
55Display73.2
61.4Camera72
79.8Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
5 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 F 5G8 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 60.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+28) and display (+18). OPPO Reno16 F 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 F 5G

  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 17% higher capacity: 7,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • 13% lower weight: 195 g vs 223 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 75 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 55
  • Stronger camera score: 72 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
Screen size6.57 ″6.78 ″+3%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2372x10801260x2800
Pixel density397 ppi452 ppi+14%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits4,500 nits+221%
Screen-to-body92.8 %+3%90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
ChipsetDimensity 7300-EnergyMediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu—2,550,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,800Top 19%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,600Top 16%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3.5 x3.7 x+6%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
Capacity7,000 mAh+17%6,000 mAh
Wired charging80 W90 W+13%
Wireless charging—30 W
Active use endurance—13 h

Design

Design comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
Weight195 g+13%223 g
Thickness8.4 mm+1%8.5 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (ColorOS 16)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: OPPO Reno16 F 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecOPPO Reno16 F 5GVivo X200 Pro
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

OPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei nova 14 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs Huawei Mate X7VSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs POCO F6 ProVSOPPO Reno16 F 5Gvs realme GT 6TVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS

Try another matchup