OPPO Reno16 FS 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
32.4Performance46.7
55Display54
61.4Camera65.9
66.6Battery55.1
100Features73.3
6 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 FS 5G6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: OPPO Reno16 FS 5G scores 56.3 against 56.3 for Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra. Pick by the categories that matter to you — OPPO Reno16 FS 5G edges ahead in features and battery, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 FS 5G
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 30% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 25% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 40 MP
- 17% higher Peak brightness: 1,400 nits vs 1,200 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 32
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 61
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.57 ″ | 6.9 ″+5% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2372x1080 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 511 ppi+29% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits+17% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.8 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,005Bottom 33% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,872Bottom 34% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 12 MP+50% |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+4% | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x | 4 x+14% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+25% | 40 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,500 mAh+30% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 196 g+12% | 222 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm+3% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 10 (One UI 2) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 FS 5G | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs HONOR X70 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs iPhone 16VSOPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs OPPO F35 Pro 5GVSOPPO Reno16 FS 5Gvs POCO X8 PowerVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs HONOR X70 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs iPhone 16VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs OPPO F35 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs POCO X8 PowerVS