OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
72.9Performance64.4
67.1Display43.7
79.1Camera55.7
85.5Battery60.8
73.3Features60
11 spec wins — OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 75.6 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+25) and display (+23). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
- Stronger performance score: 73 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 79 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 60
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 58% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.32 ″
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.32 ″ | 10 ″+58% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi+71% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits+13% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 93.4 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 8550 Super | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,294,761 | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.5 x+17% | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,700 mAh+20% | 5,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 19.5 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+39% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+36% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
OPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs OPPO Find X10 Pro MaxVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Honor 500 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs Redmi K100 ProVSOPPO Reno16 Pro 5Gvs REDMI K80 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS