OUKITEL C18 vs ZTE Blade A34
20Performancechip20
23.6Display20
20.5Camera20
38.8Battery38.8
20Features20
2 spec wins — OUKITEL C184 spec wins — ZTE Blade A34
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: OUKITEL C18 scores 24.6 against 23.8 for ZTE Blade A34. Pick by the categories that matter to you — OUKITEL C18 edges ahead in display and camera, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OUKITEL C18
- Stronger display score: 24 vs 20
- 100% higher Wired charging: 10 W vs 5 W
- 63% higher Main camera: 13 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the ZTE Blade A34
- 32% higher Pixel density: 267 ppi vs 202 ppi
Display
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.52 ″ | 6.6 ″+1% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 540x1200 | 720x1612 |
| Pixel density | 202 ppi | 267 ppi+32% |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 82.7 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Unisoc T310 | Unisoc SC9863A |
| RAM (max) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage options | 64GB, 128GB | 64GB |
Camera
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
Battery
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10 W+100% | 5 W |
Design
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 198 g | 185 g+7% |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.5 mm+9% |
Connectivity
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | No |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C 2.0 |
Software
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 13 |
Audio
| Spec | OUKITEL C18 | ZTE Blade A34 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |