Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F5 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

POCO F5 Pro

Xiaomi

POCO F5 Pro

$449

53.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
48.1Performance86.9
56.3Display74.3
44.1Camera75.8
65.2Battery83.3
60Features84
3 spec wins — POCO F5 Pro14 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 53.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+39) and camera (+32). POCO F5 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F5 Pro

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 16% higher Pixel density: 526 ppi vs 452 ppi
  • 10% lower weight: 204 g vs 226 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 48
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 56
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 65
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.67 ″6.78 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution3200x14401260x2800
Pixel density526 ppi+16%452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits4,500 nits+221%
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu1,300,0003,533,222+172%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,800Top 39%3,473+93%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,600Top 41%10,264+123%Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video8K@24fps8K@30fps
Front camera16 MP50 MP+213%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,160 mAh6,510 mAh+26%
Wired charging67 W90 W+34%
Wireless charging30 W40 W+33%
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
Weight204 g+10%226 g
Thickness8.6 mm8 mm+7%
IP ratingIP53IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 13 (MIUI 14)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge2 years5 years+150%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F5 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5 ProVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup