Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F5 vs Vivo X300 Pro

POCO F5

Xiaomi

POCO F5

$379

48.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
44Performance86.9
45.5Display74.3
44.1Camera75.8
58.4Battery83.3
60Features84
4 spec wins — POCO F512 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 48.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+43) and camera (+32). POCO F5 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F5

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 20% lower weight: 181 g vs 226 g
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 46
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 58
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.67 ″6.78 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801260x2800
Pixel density395 ppi452 ppi+14%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits4,500 nits+350%
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared1,263,761Bottom 44%3,533,222
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)504,689Bottom 49%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)173,509Bottom 40%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)219,815Bottom 44%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)365,748Bottom 46%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,430Top 46%3,473+143%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,150Top 46%10,264+147%Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera16 MP50 MP+213%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh6,510 mAh+30%
Wired charging67 W90 W+34%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
Weight181 g+20%226 g
Thickness7.9 mm+1%8 mm
IP ratingIP53IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 13 (MIUI 14)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge2 years5 years+150%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F5 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecPOCO F5Vivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup