RedMagic 9S Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
62.6Performance74.8
57.1Display58.4
51.5Camera55.7
75.1Battery47.9
86.7Features94.7
7 spec wins — RedMagic 9S Pro8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: RedMagic 9S Pro scores 64.2 against 64.3 for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 edges ahead in performance and features, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the RedMagic 9S Pro
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 48
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 25 W
- 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
- 48% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- Lower launch price: $649 vs $2,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 63
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 52
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 63% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,600 nits
Display
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 ″ | 8 ″+18% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1116x2480 | 1968x2184 |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi+9% | 368 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 2,600 nits+63% |
| Screen-to-body | 93.7 %+3% | 90.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Leading Version | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,277Top 26% | 2,703+19%Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,097Top 25% | 9,317+31%Top 13% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,500 mAh+48% | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 229 g | 215 g+6% |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (RedMagic OS 9.5) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | RedMagic 9S Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
RedMagic 9S Provs Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate DesignVSRedMagic 9S Provs TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVSRedMagic 9S Provs ZTE Axon 60 UltraVSRedMagic 9S Provs Huawei nova 16VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs ZTE Axon 60 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs iQOO Neo9 ProVS