Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs Vivo X200 Pro
27.1Performance74.5
34.4Display73.2
30.1Camera72
43.7Battery79.9
49.3Features78.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G15 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+47) and camera (+42). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years
- 10% lower weight: 200 g vs 223 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 34
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 49
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 452 ppi+17% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 733 nits | 4,500 nits+514% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 510,132Bottom 3% | 2,550,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 211,597Bottom 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 43,559Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 110,374Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 144,602Bottom 2% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 728Bottom 13% | 2,800+285%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,943Bottom 13% | 8,600+343%Top 16% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 96 %Top 47% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+10% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+7% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+50% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |