Samsung Galaxy A17 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro
29.1Performance74.5
44Display73.2
41.9Camera72
43.7Battery79.9
65.3Features78.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A17 5G13 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and battery (+36). Samsung Galaxy A17 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years
- 14% lower weight: 192 g vs 223 g
- 12% lower thickness: 7.5 mm vs 8.5 mm
- Lower launch price: $200 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 452 ppi+17% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 603,772Bottom 11% | 2,550,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 245,695Bottom 13% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 42,916Bottom 2% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 129,349Bottom 4% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 185,812Bottom 11% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 988Bottom 28% | 2,800+183%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,093Bottom 21% | 8,600+311%Top 16% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3.7 x+270% |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 192 g+14% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm+12% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+50% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Xiaomi 13 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 20 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Huawei nova 12 SEVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS