Samsung Galaxy F36 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro
28.9Performance86.9
59.2Display74.3
41.9Camera75.8
43.7Battery83.3
65.3Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy F36 5G9 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 44.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and battery (+40). Samsung Galaxy F36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
- 20% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 5 years
- 13% lower weight: 197 g vs 226 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 452 ppi+17% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,533,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,473Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 10,264Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+285% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,510 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 197 g+13% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm+4% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+20% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs iQOO Z11xVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs Nothing Phone (4b)VSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs OPPO F29 5GVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy M36 5GVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS