Samsung Galaxy M47 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro
28.9Performance74.5
58.5Display73.2
41.7Camera72
61.9Battery79.9
65.3Features78.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M47 5G9 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 47.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and camera (+30). Samsung Galaxy M47 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
- 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 62
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 452 ppi+17% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.8 % | 90.3 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,800Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,600Top 16% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP+167% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 206 g+8% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm+5% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+50% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs Honor 90VSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs Infinix ZERO FlipVSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs iPhone 17eVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS