Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
29.1Performance86.9
55.1Display74.3
56.4Camera75.8
41.7Battery83.3
73.3Features84
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra13 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and battery (+42). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x
- 10% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 452 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+10% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 4,500 nits+200% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | 3,533,222+607% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,473+286%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 10,264+287%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP+1567% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+35% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,510 mAh+45% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g+8% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm+1% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS