Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
29.1Performance86.9
54Display74.3
65.9Camera75.8
55.1Battery83.3
73.3Features84
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra13 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and battery (+28). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 13% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 452 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 66
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi+13% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits+275% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | 3,533,222+607% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,473+286%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 10,264+287%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 4 x+8% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP | 50 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,510 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g+2% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm+9% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS