Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Vivo X300 Pro
79.3Performance86.9
63.6Display74.3
47.3Camera75.8
54.2Battery83.3
94.7Features84
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25+12 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 66.3, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+29) and camera (+29). Samsung Galaxy S25+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
- 16% lower weight: 190 g vs 226 g
- 13% higher Pixel density: 513 ppi vs 452 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 79
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 64
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
- 1900% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi+13% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,763,072Top 22% | 3,533,222 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 866,625Top 16% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 996,402Top 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,621Top 28% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 552,424Top 28% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,141Top 11% | 3,473+11%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,153Top 7% | 10,264+1%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3.7 x+23% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,900 mAh | 6,510 mAh+33% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g+16% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+9% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25+vs Infinix Note 60 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs OPPO Reno15 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs Huawei Pura X MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs iPhone 16 Pro MaxVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS