Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
80Performance64.4
66.7Display43.7
74Camera55.7
65.8Battery60.8
94.7Features60
8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 74.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+23). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 80 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 66 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- Lower launch price: $1,300 vs $2,899
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″
- 12% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 10 ″+45% |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 2160x1584 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+85% | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits+63% | 1,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 92.5 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 2,787,981Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 895,141Top 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 989,555Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 348,188Top 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 555,097Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,030Top 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,800Top 8% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 12 MP+20% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+12% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 218 g+29% | 309 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+36% | 12.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Titanium | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs HONOR 600 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)VSSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultravs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VS