Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Vivo X200 Pro
74Performance74.5
61.3Display73.2
47.3Camera72
51.4Battery79.9
94.7Features78.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S2513 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 63.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+29) and camera (+25). Samsung Galaxy S25 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 79
- 75% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 4 years
- 27% lower weight: 162 g vs 223 g
- 15% lower thickness: 7.2 mm vs 8.5 mm
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 61
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 51
- 1900% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher Ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.2 ″ | 6.78 ″+9% |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 416 ppi | 452 ppi+9% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 91.1 %+1% | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,300,000 | 2,550,000+11% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+5% | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,400+9% | 8,600 |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128/256/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3.7 x+23% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP+167% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+50% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | 13 h+8% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 162 g+27% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+15% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+75% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25vs iPhone 16 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XLVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7VSSamsung Galaxy S25vs Samsung Galaxy S24+VSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VSVivo X200 Provs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVS