Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
76Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
90Performance86.9
62.7Display74.3
74Camera75.8
61.2Battery83.3
94.7Features84
9 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra7 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 76, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+22) and display (+12). Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 90 vs 87
  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
  • 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 63
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 61
  • 317% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 12 MP
  • 300% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 73% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.9 ″+2%6.78 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution3120x14401260x2800
Pixel density498 ppi+10%452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,600 nits4,500 nits+73%
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for GalaxyMediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared3,437,807Top 7%3,533,222
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)1,017,509Top 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)1,344,505Top 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)390,717Top 19%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)685,076Top 8%—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,850+11%Top 1%3,473Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)11,900+16%Top 1%10,264Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.57
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom5 x+35%3.7 x
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera12 MP50 MP+317%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh6,510 mAh+30%
Wired charging60 W90 W+50%
Wireless charging25 W40 W+60%
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
Weight214 g+5%226 g
Thickness7.9 mm+1%8 mm
IP ratingIP68IP68/IP69
Frame materialTitaniumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8.5)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge7 years+40%5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy S26 UltraVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup