Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Vivo X300 Pro
45.6Performance86.9
58.3Display74.3
42.1Camera75.8
36.9Battery83.3
94.7Features84
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE12 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+46) and performance (+41). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
- 17% lower weight: 187 g vs 226 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 46
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 37
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 426 ppi | 452 ppi+6% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,533,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,044Top 33% | 3,473+70%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,761Top 26% | 10,264+52%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 6,510 mAh+63% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 187 g+17% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 14.9 mm | 8 mm+46% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Google Pixel 8aVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs POCO X7VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Samsung Galaxy F55 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)VSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS