Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Vivo X300 Pro
60.9Performance86.9
58.6Display74.3
46.9Camera75.8
47.9Battery83.3
94.7Features84
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 617 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 58.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+35) and camera (+29). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
- 12% higher Screen size: 7.6 ″ vs 6.78 ″
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 61
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 48
- 1900% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7.6 ″+12% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1856x2160 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 452 ppi+21% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 90.5 % | 91.6 %+1% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 1,820,000 | 3,533,222+94% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,270Top 24% | 3,473+53%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,000Top 23% | 10,264+47%Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3.7 x+23% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 6,510 mAh+48% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | 10 h | 12.8 h+28% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 239 g | 226 g+5% |
| Thickness | 12.1 mm | 8 mm+34% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1.1) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs Google Pixel 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs REDMI Note 15 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs Huawei Pura 70VSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS