Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 vs Vivo X200 Pro
86.1Performance74.5
61.6Display73.2
50.2Camera72
67.5Battery79.9
94.7Features78.7
7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 88 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 71.2, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+22) and battery (+12). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
- Stronger performance score: 86 vs 75
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 79
- 75% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 4 years
- 26% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,528 vs 2,800
- 23% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,619 vs 8,600
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 62
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 50
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 68
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 100% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 45 W
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,900
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7.6 ″+12% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2448x1848 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 404 ppi | 452 ppi+12% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | 89.6 % | 90.3 %+1% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | 2,947,517+16% | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,528+26%Top 6% | 2,800Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,619+23%Top 4% | 8,600Top 16% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 11% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 20 W | 30 W+50% |
| Active use endurance | 13.8 h+6% | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 201 g+10% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.5 mm+12% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 17 (One UI 9) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+75% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Samsung Galaxy S26+VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs iQOO Z10 TurboVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS