Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Ulefone Armor 24 Pro

WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
48.5Inno Score
64.4Performance46.7
43.7Display40.2
55.7Camera32.3
60.8Battery77
60Features46.7
7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold4 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 24 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold wins this phone face-off, 57.4 to 48.5, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+23) and performance (+18). Ulefone Armor 24 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 44 vs 40
  • Stronger camera score: 56 vs 32
  • Stronger features score: 60 vs 47
  • 248% higher Peak brightness: 1,600 nits vs 460 nits

Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 24 Pro

  • Stronger battery score: 77 vs 61
  • 293% higher capacity: 22,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • 60% higher Front camera: 16 MP vs 10 MP
  • 47% higher Pixel density: 396 ppi vs 269 ppi
  • 47% higher Wired charging: 66 W vs 45 W
  • Lower launch price: $360 vs $2,899

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
Screen size10 ″+47%6.78 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCD
Resolution2160x15841080x2460
Pixel density269 ppi396 ppi+47%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits+248%460 nits
Screen-to-body—69.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxyMediaTek Helio G200
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB256GB
Storage type—UFS2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
Main camera200 MP+213%64 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.89
Ultra-wide12 MP—
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video—1440p@30fps
Front camera10 MP16 MP+60%
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
Capacity5,600 mAh22,000 mAh+293%
Wired charging45 W66 W+47%
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
Weight309 g+52%647 g
Thickness12.9 mm+53%27.5 mm
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69K
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 16

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Ulefone Armor 24 Pro
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldUlefone Armor 24 Pro
3.5mm jack—Yes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup