Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X300
64.4Performance85.4
43.7Display73.5
55.7Camera78.1
60.8Battery87.2
60Features84
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold10 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+30) and battery (+26). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 58% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.31 ″
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 64
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 61
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 60
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 10 ″+58% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 461 ppi+71% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 4,500 nits+181% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,416,530 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,446Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 9,843Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | — | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,600 mAh | 6,040 mAh+8% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 17.5 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 309 g | 190 g+39% |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8 mm+38% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Titanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum Frame | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | — | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OnePlus Nord 6VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs OPPO Reno13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldvs Nothing Phone (4a)VSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS