Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
57.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
81.4Inno Score
64.4Performance87.6
43.7Display67.4
55.7Camera77
60.8Battery81
60Features100
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold11 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 81.4 to 57.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+40) and display (+24). Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • 45% higher Screen size: 10 ″ vs 6.9 ″

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 88 vs 64
  • Stronger display score: 67 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 77 vs 56
  • Stronger battery score: 81 vs 61
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
Screen size10 ″+45%6.9 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2XLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2160x15841200x2608
Pixel density269 ppi416 ppi+55%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits3,500 nits+119%
Screen-to-body—92.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Elite for GalaxySnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—3,600,724Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—1,032,276Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,345,109Top 6%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—495,988Top 2%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—727,351Top 6%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options512GB/1TB512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.67
Ultra-wide12 MP50 MP+317%
Telephoto10 MP200 MP+1900%
Optical zoom3 x4.3 x+43%
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera10 MP50 MP+400%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
Capacity5,600 mAh6,000 mAh+7%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging15 W50 W+233%

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
Weight309 g219 g+29%
Thickness12.9 mm8.3 mm+36%
IP ratingIP48IP68/IP69
Frame materialTitanium Hinge Housing and Advanced Armor Aluminum FrameAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (One UI 8)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold versus Xiaomi 17 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z TriFoldXiaomi 17 Ultra
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup